Release Channels

There are two different release channels that can be selected. The stable channel is the more stable one, and is introduced by the change in release process in February, 2017. The candidate channel contains the usual bi-weekly release from the development branch.

There are a number of trade-offs between the two:

Stable Candidate
Stability More Stable More Experimental
Features & Fixes About two weeks behind Latest
Auto Upgrades Optional Mandatory [1]
Anon. Usage Reporting Optional Mandatory
Support Fully supported Fully supported [2]

Run the candidate channel if you are technically savvy and enjoy new features. Run the stable channel if you want to minimize the amount of surprises you might run into.

[1]Auto upgrades are not enabled in builds delivered via APT or Snap.
[2]Yes, there is intentionally no difference here.

Life Cycle

Every new feature and bugfix begins its life in the development branch, master. Every two weeks the current master becomes a release candidate. This version is identified by “-rc” in it’s name, for example “0.14.35-rc.1”.

Those running the candidate channel will update to this release candidate. During the next twelve days it receives testing “in the wild”. Any new, serious issues that are discovered are fixed, and new release candidates “0.14.35-rc.2” etc are created as needed. These release candidates do not include any new features or non-essential bugfixes added to master in the meantime.

Once the release candidate is deemed stable, typically after twelve days, it becomes a stable release and is promoted to the stable channel. Stable releases are given version numbers without any suffix - “0.14.35”. Unless any serious issues were discovered, this release is exactly identical to the “-rc.1” release candidated twelve days prior.

The cycle then restarts two days later with a new release candidate based on the current master branch.

How to Choose

Built-in / GitHub

For releases obtained from or GitHub, with built-in upgrade functionality, the choice is made in the “Settings” dialog. Set the “Automatic upgrade” drop down to either “Stable releases only” or “Stable releases and release candidates”.

APT (Debian)

The choice between stable and candidate is done in the APT source configuration. Please see our APT instructions.


The snap tool can be told to install the candidate channel, but defaults to the stable channel. See the Snap documentation for detail.

Some Other Distribution Channel

If you are getting packages from your Linux distribution, NAS vendor, etc., then you should be getting the stable channel. If you get a release candidate you should complain to your distributor or vendor and refer them to this page.


Which bugfixes trigger a new release candidate?

Those that fix a regression since the last release. Lets say the current release is 0.14.35. We release 0.14.36-rc.1 and discover a new problem that is not present in 0.14.35. This gets fixed and we release a new 0.14.36-rc.2 candidate. However, if we discover and fix a problem that’s been present since 0.14.20, this fix will instead be incorporated in the next regular cycle.

What’s the difference between the latest candidate and the following stable release?

Nothing. If we release 0.14.36-rc.1 and no serious problems are discovered during the next twelve days, this is the exact software that will become 0.14.36 for general consumption. Since the version number is different it requires a rebuild and the release signatures / hashes are different. If you are on the candidate channel, your Syncthing will “upgrade” from 0.14.36-rc.1 to 0.14.36 when we make the release. This is normal.

What’s with the “twelve days” thing?

We typically release every two weeks. Giving a release candidate twelve days to soak means that we have two days to relax and observe after the release before the next release candidate is due.

It’s not a number that is set in stone. The stable release may be delayed if problems are discovered and we release updated release candidates. In that case the next release candidate may also be delayed to bring us back in sync with the weeks.

Who decided on “every two weeks”?

@calmh did, as a reasonable balance between getting releases out quickly, not tiring our users with too frequent updates, and not burning out due to juggling releases all the time. Introducing this scheme effectively doubles the amount of releases that happen in the normal case. The frequency may change in the future.